Instructions for Evaluation of ATISP August 2002

There are two purposes to this evaluation. The first block of 9 items will provide feedback to the National Science Foundation (NSF) to evaluate the Advanced Training Institute in Social Psychology held at CSUF July 9-14, 2003 with respect to its value to science, education, and your professional development. The second purpose is to provide information to the Board of Advisors of our ATISP to help them make improvements for future sessions of the ATI. If you wish, you may include or omit your name.

Your Name: (Optional)

---

Evaluation of the ATISP for National Science Foundation

The following group of questions concern the overall quality of the ATISP you attended and its value to your research, teaching, and understanding of Internet Research. These are for the evaluation for NSF.

1. Please rate the quality of the content Presented
very poor very good

2. Please rate the quality of the instruction provided (Were the instructors able to communicate the content well?)
very poor very good

3. Please rate the value of the ATI to your research program.
very poor very good

4. Please rate the value of the ATI to your teaching (will you be able to make use of the information learned at the ATI in your teaching?)
very poor very good

5. How were the accommodations and arrangements (Hotel, coffee breaks, receptions, facilities, etc.)
very poor very good

6. Please rate the organization and planning of the ATI.
very poor very good

7. Please rate the social atmosphere created at the ATI (was the social climate cold and impersonal or warm and supportive?)
very poor very good

8. Please make an overall judgment of the value of the ATI to you (including educational, scientific, and personal value).
very poor very good

9. Comments to NSF on the Overall Value of the ATISP (What will be the ultimate impact of ATI on Science and Education? Was taxpayers' money well-spent on this project as opposed to others it might have funded?):

---

Suggestions to the Board of Advisors for Improving Future Sessions

Please evaluate the following ideas or suggested changes for the ATISP. Which of the following would be good changes, in your opinion, and which would not?

10. Less content and more free time?
poor change good change

11. More massed instruction (e.g., all Authorware on one day, all Java on another day)?
poor change good change

12. More Two-Way discussion with students (less prepared material)?
poor change good change

13. Delete seating plans (let people choose their own company)?
poor change good change

---

Please rate the following components of the ATI. They are placed below in approximate order of presentation, starting with Thursday at 8:30 am. Supposing that material might be deleted (to allow for extra discussion, free time to work on the computers, or other activities), which material should or should not be deleted?

14. SurveyWiz, FactorWiz, HTML Forms, and basic color (Birnbaum)
delete this material keep this material

15. Install Apache server, Perl, & install CGI script (Schmidt).
delete this material keep this material

16. Five Errors In Internet-based experiments & How to Avoid (Reips).
delete this material keep this material

17. Intro to WeXTor (Reips).
delete this material keep this material

18. Intro. to Digital Camera (Krantz).
delete this material keep this material

19. Thursday's wrap-up session 4-5 pm.
delete this material keep this material

20. Authorware Introduction (Williams).
delete this material keep this material

21. Server-side programming (Schmidt).
delete this material keep this material

22. WWW-Survey Assistant (Schmidt).
delete this material keep this material

23. Digital Cameras, working with ImageJ (Krantz)
delete this material keep this material

24. Running a Web server/Web Lab (Schmidt and Reips).
delete this material keep this material

25. Working with Authorware (Williams).
delete this material keep this material

26. Introduction to Java and JBuilder (McClelland).
delete this material keep this material

27. Techniques and guidelines for Web Experimenting (Reips).
delete this material keep this material

28. WeXTor and LogAnalyzer (Reips)
delete this material keep this material

29. Methodology Review (Panel discussion-Saturday 4-5).
delete this material keep this material

30. Review of Basic HTML and Introduction to JavaScript (Birnbaum).
delete this material keep this material

31. Developing Java Applets / Object-Oriented Programming (McClelland).
delete this material keep this material

32. Methodological take home messages (Reips).
delete this material keep this material

33. Media useful to social psychology presented via the WWW (Krantz).
delete this material keep this material

34. Final wrap-up Sunday evening. (all instructors)
delete this material keep this material

35. Please give comments or suggestions regarding content (what content should be extended or added and what should be minimized or deleted?). (Please include suggestions for different content here as well; e.g., streaming media, etc.):

36. Comments on the social events (what should we keep and what to change?):

37. Other comments and suggestions (e.g., anyone mislabeled or misspelled in the picture caption?):

Please check your answers. When you are done, push the button below.

Thank You!